May 21, 2008
You go girl. Get what’s yours.
Cellar daughter Elizabeth Fritzl is planning to sue her father.
It is reported today that she will claim his fortune.
Her lawyer, Christoph Herbst, revealed a legal battle is to begin, The Sun reported.
In a new TV documentary he says: “We have discussed if we want to do something against the father or sue him for damages. This is a decision that has to be taken by Elisabeth.”
It has also emerged that therapy for Fritzl’s incest victims will cost more than £780,000.
Elisabeth, 42, and her six children, all fathered by her dad, will have to remain in a psychiatric clinic for the next three months.
The Sun revealed they could all get new identities.
Herbst said he had great admiration for Elisabeth for managing to give her children a normal education deapite living in a dungeon.
He said: “They had lessons, they learned grammar, they learned the language, mathematics. So they have been raised very well. They are very well-behaved.”
No related posts.
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.
Sable Verity is a reporter and commentator based in Seattle who covers social and political issues for KBCS Radio and a number of online and print news outlets. All of this is her fault. 
REALLY, IT IS VERY OUFULL STORY. BUT EVERYDAY SUN RISES, THAN GET NEW OPPURTUNIES. I HOPE THIS FAMILY WILL BE HAVE NORMAL LIFE, WILL FORGET WHAT THEY LEFT.
All cheers to Elisabeth for contemplating suing her bastard, monster, evil, sick, sadistic, devilish father. Elisabeth should get as much from her father as she can, though it will hardly make up for the wasted years of her life. As for Joseph Fritzl, I say this: Tear down and make an absolute ruin of everything that is his. Tear down and demolish his life and everything that is otherwise connected to him. Burn it, trash it, rip it, shred it, and ruin it — that is, whatever Elisabeth doesn’t get first. May everything that Joseph ever did within this world be cursed.
jeez. what a bunch of sensationalist croc. frittzl is up to his eyes in debt. the guy is an extreme narcisstist – there is nothing left for them. this familiy are going to need support to survive and it is not going to come from him.
elisabeth, u shall sue ur monster father! he is not a human, more worst then animal.!
If I Was Elizabeth F. I Would Sue Him For Everything And Anything I Could. But I Wouldn’t Want A Penny Of His Filthy Money To Live Off Of. I Would Only Put It To Any Medical Bills If Needed.
The Government Could Keep His Property In Exchange Of All The Support She Will Need, A New Home To Live In With Plenty Of Space To Run Around, Plenty Of Open Windows, Extra Rooms For Activity Play And Family Gatherings, A View Of The Sun Set And Sun Rise. ;-D
And Also Support For Food And Clothing, Along With Pocket Money For Activities And Explore The World.
With Much Love To Her And The Family!
~Chandra {Boston, MA.}
Hi Good Morning to Elizabeth, Kersten, Felix,
If you do not get any form Joseph’s estate, then I for myself would beg the whole world to donate whatever they can. Little drops of water makes the mighty OCEAN.
We will all help you. You 3 deserve a good life for what you have missed.
God Bless you all.
Sathya,
What about Stefan?
Don’t forget him…
And blessings to the other children: Monica, Lisa and Alex – May you have much happiness in your lives.
“But I Wouldn’t Want A Penny Of His Filthy Money To Live Off Of. I Would Only Put It To Any Medical Bills If Needed.”
___
This “filthy money” notion bewilders me. Money is fungible, which means that your money is exactly like my money, and if I lose my money and get more money, it’s exactly like the old money. There is no “bad” money or “good” money. The money she gets from Josef (probably none, but that’s not my point) looks, feels, and behaves exactly like the money she gets from you or me or the Austrian government.
One hears this concept with regard to child support, death settlements (but not insurance), and money earned illegally by someone else which has come into your possession legitimately. The bottom line seems to be, “good” people should remain impoverished, and “bad” people should keep and enjoy their money.
Let me suggest, instead, that nothing cleans dirty money like passing through the hands of a deserving recipient.
In general, by the way, the merit of rejecting “bad” money is most obvious to one when the person being advised to decline the money is not oneself.